Skip to content
40 Milton Avenue, AlpharettaMedical Director: Anita Rao, MD(678) 555-0142

Disclosures

Every disclosure this practice publishes, in full, with the authority behind each one and where it appears. If you want to check what we are required to tell you, it is all here.

  1. medical-director

    Prescribed

    Georgia advertising for medical services must identify the physician responsible for them; a trade name alone is not sufficient. Most practices in this category do not name one at all, which makes it a ten-second check worth running on anybody you are comparing us with.

  2. good-faith-exam

    Prescribed

    Delegated medical treatment in Georgia requires a good-faith examination by a licensed provider before treatment, under written protocols. It is also the practice's whole booking model: a request is a request, and a confirmation that reads like an appointment creates an expectation nobody has accepted.

  3. results-may-vary

    House rule

    A photograph beside a treatment name is read as a prediction by the person deciding whether to be treated. This practice publishes no patient photographs at all, so the notice has no image to sit beside — it is published here in full, and the reason there are none is answered in the FAQ.

  4. results-not-typical

    Prescribed

    An atypical result requires its own disclosure, adjacent to that result. It is a DIFFERENT disclaimer from results-may-vary with a different trigger, and shipping one in place of the other is a defect. It renders only where a case is flagged above-typical — a blanket version applied to every photograph is meaningless and reads as an admission.

  5. no-off-label

    House rule

    Promoting a product for a use it has not been approved for is an FDA matter rather than a marketing one, and so is representing a compounded preparation as equivalent to a manufacturer's product. This practice names no product at all — every treatment is described by its generic category — which is what makes both impossible rather than merely forbidden.

  6. no-weight-loss-claims

    House rule

    Outcome claims about body weight require clinical substantiation this practice does not have, and the drugs the category is currently built on would be promoted off-label. This practice does not offer that service and does not mention it; the disclaimer states the boundary where the adjacent treatments could be misread as approaching it.

  7. material-connection

    Prescribed

    The most commonly violated FTC rule in this vertical. A free treatment, a discount, a gift card, a referral credit or an employment relationship behind a statement must be disclosed AT THE START of that statement, not in a footnote under it. This practice publishes no testimonials, so nothing currently triggers it — the entry stays because the day one is published is the day it is needed, and that is the day nobody remembers to add it.

  8. reg-z

    Prescribed

    Regulation Z makes certain financing terms 'triggering terms' in an advertisement: state one and the advertisement must disclose the others. The rule attaches to the phrase rather than to the page, which is why it carries triggers as well as a required route.

  9. membership-terms

    House rule

    A recurring charge with an auto-renewal is a contract, and the terms that matter — how to cancel, what rolls over, what happens to the discount — belong beside the price rather than in a footer. Publishing the price and withholding those is publishing the flattering half.

  10. gift-card-terms

    House rule

    Gift certificate expiry, dormancy fees and cash-back thresholds are set by state law and by the federal CARD Act, and they differ. The terms have to travel with the point of sale rather than living on a legal page nobody opens.

  11. not-medical-advice

    House rule

    Explaining how a treatment or a skin condition works reads as advice to the person reading it. The skin quiz is the sharpest case: it hands back two concerns and a suggested starting place, which is shaped exactly like an assessment, and the qualifier beside it is what says it is not one.

8 entries are not closed

The wording of the entries below was drafted from secondary compliance summaries rather than from the primary statutory or regulatory text, and the Georgia rules governing delegated cosmetic medical services changed during the 2026 legislative session. Our counsel is reading each one against the primary source, and the wording here will change where it needs to. We would rather publish that than let a page of small print imply a certainty nobody has.

  • medical-director Georgia Composite Medical Board / O.C.G.A. Title 43, Chapter 34
  • good-faith-exam Georgia Composite Medical Board Rule 360-32 (delegation of cosmetic medical services)
  • results-not-typical FTC Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising, 16 CFR Part 255
  • photo-consent Practice policy, following state privacy law and HIPAA marketing authorization requirements
  • material-connection FTC Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising, 16 CFR Part 255
  • reg-z Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.24 (Truth in Lending Act advertising rules)
  • membership-terms Practice policy, following contract law and state automatic-renewal statutes
  • gift-card-terms Practice policy, following the CARD Act and Georgia gift-certificate law
CallConsultation